↓ Skip to main content

Diversity of structures and properties among catalases

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents
wikipedia
20 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1058 Mendeley
Title
Diversity of structures and properties among catalases
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00018-003-3206-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Chelikani, I. Fita, P. C. Loewen

Abstract

More than 300 catalase sequences are now available, divided among monofunctional catalases (> 225), bifunctional catalase-peroxidases (> 50) and manganese-containing catalases (> 25). When combined with the recent appearance of crystal structures from at least two representatives from each of these groups (nine from the monofunctional catalases), valuable insights into the catalatic reaction mechanism in its various forms and into catalase evolution have been gained. The structures have revealed an unusually large number of modifications unique to catalases, a result of interacting with reactive oxygen species. Biochemical and physiological characterization of catalases from many different organisms has revealed a surprisingly wide range of catalatic efficiencies, despite similar sequences. Catalase gene expression in micro-organisms generally is controlled either by sensors of reactive oxygen species or by growth phase regulons, although the detailed mechanisms vary considerably.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,058 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1031 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 198 19%
Student > Bachelor 160 15%
Student > Master 127 12%
Researcher 114 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 58 5%
Other 126 12%
Unknown 275 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 252 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 167 16%
Chemistry 72 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 37 3%
Other 158 15%
Unknown 313 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,460,684
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#571
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,397
of 136,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.