↓ Skip to main content

RNA splicing and debranching viewed through analysis of RNA lariats

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
RNA splicing and debranching viewed through analysis of RNA lariats
Published in
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00438-011-0635-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi Cheng, Thomas M. Menees

Abstract

Intron lariat RNAs, created by pre-mRNA splicing, are sources of information on gene expression and structure. Although produced equivalently to their corresponding mRNAs, the vast majority of intron lariat RNAs are rapidly degraded. However, their levels are enhanced in cells deficient for RNA debranching enzyme, which catalyzes linearization of these RNAs, the rate-limiting step in their degradation. Furthermore, RNA lariats are resistant to degradation by the 3' exonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), providing a means to enrich for lariat RNAs. Working with the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism, our goal was to develop novel combinations of methods to enhance the use of intron lariat RNAs as objects of study. Using RT-PCR assays developed for detecting and quantifying specific lariat RNAs, we demonstrate the resistance of RNA lariats to degradation by PNPase and their sensitivity to cleavage by RNA debranching enzyme. We also employ sequential treatments with these two enzymes to produce characteristic effects on linear and lariat RNAs. We establish the utility of the methods for analyzing RNA debranching enzyme variants and in vitro debranching reactions and discuss several possible applications, including measuring relative rates of transcription and combining these methods with non-gene-specific RNA sequencing as a novel approach for genome annotation. In summary, enzymatic treatments that produce characteristic effects on linear and lariat RNAs, combined with RT-PCR or RNA sequencing, can be powerful tools to advance studies on gene expression, alternative splicing, and any process that depends on the RNA debranching enzyme.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 8%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 59 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 36%
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#920
of 3,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,779
of 155,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.