↓ Skip to main content

The Reporoa Caldera, Taupo Volcanic Zone: source of the Kaingaroa Ignimbrites

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, December 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Reporoa Caldera, Taupo Volcanic Zone: source of the Kaingaroa Ignimbrites
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, December 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00302833
Authors

I. A. Nairn, C. P. Wood, R. A. Bailey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 3 10%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Master 6 19%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 65%
Linguistics 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,522,368
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#385
of 1,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,041
of 76,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.