| Title |
Chemical hardness and density functional theory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Sciences, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02708340 |
| Authors |
Ralph G. Pearson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Romania | 2 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 423 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 90 | 21% |
| Researcher | 58 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 6% |
| Professor | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 77 | 18% |
| Unknown | 108 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 168 | 38% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 40 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 28 | 6% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 10% |
| Unknown | 127 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Sciences
#49
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,388
of 58,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them