↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of topically applied invermectin against sarcoptic mange (Sarcoptes scabiei var.bovis) of cattle

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, February 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of topically applied invermectin against sarcoptic mange (Sarcoptes scabiei var.bovis) of cattle
Published in
Parasitology Research, February 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00931652
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. D. Soll, J. A. d'Assonville, C. J. Z. Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 33%
Other 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#737
of 4,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,509
of 61,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them