↓ Skip to main content

Synthesis and application of dipeptides; current status and perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Synthesis and application of dipeptides; current status and perspectives
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00253-008-1590-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Yagasaki, Shin-ichi Hashimoto

Abstract

The functions and applications of L-alpha-dipeptides (dipeptides) have been poorly studied compared with proteins or amino acids. Only a few dipeptides, such as aspartame (L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine methyl ester) and L-alanyl-L-glutamine (Ala-Gln), are commercially used. This can be attributed to the lack of an efficient process for dipeptide production though various chemical or chemoenzymatic method have been reported. Recently, however, novel methods have arisen for dipeptide synthesis including a nonribosomal peptide-synthetase-based method and an L-amino acid alpha-ligase-based method, both of which enable dipeptides to be produced through fermentative processes. Since it has been revealed that some dipeptides have unique physiological functions, the progress in production methods will undoubtedly accelerate the applications of dipeptides in many fields. In this review, the functions and applications of dipeptides, mainly in commercial use, and methods for dipeptide production including already proven processes as well as newly developed ones are summarized. As aspartame and Ala-Gln are produced using different industrial processes, the manufacturing processes of these two dipeptides are compared to clarify the characteristics of each procedure.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 150 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Student > Master 26 17%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 40 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 37 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 16%
Engineering 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,089,278
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,221
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,376
of 95,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#11
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.