| Title |
A systematic framework to understand central bank digital currency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Information Sciences, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11432-017-9294-5 |
| Authors |
Qian Yao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 6% |
| Researcher | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 80 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 32 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 29 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 82 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,957,301
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Science China Information Sciences
#40
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,515
of 450,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Information Sciences
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.