↓ Skip to main content

The mangrove ant, Camponotus anderseni, switches to anaerobic respiration in response to elevated CO2 levels

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Insect Physiology, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The mangrove ant, Camponotus anderseni, switches to anaerobic respiration in response to elevated CO2 levels
Published in
Journal of Insect Physiology, February 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.02.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.G. Nielsen, K.A. Christian

Abstract

The small tree-living mangrove ant Camponotus anderseni is remarkably adapted for surviving tidal inundation. By blocking the nest entrance with a soldier's head, water intrusion into the nest cavity can be effectively prevented, but lack of gas-exchange caused extremely high concentrations of CO(2)(>30%) and very low O(2) concentrations (<1%). The O(2) uptake in experiments with CO(2) absorption showed a linear decrease until about 4%, whereas the O(2) uptake in chambers without absorbent showed a decrease with a different pattern, consisting of three parts. The first component of this decrease is a linear decrease to about 18%, which is the normal O(2) concentration in open natural nests. The second phase is an exponential decrease continuing to about 4% O(2), showing that the CO(2) concentrations have influence on the O(2) uptake. The final component is also exponential, but with a much smaller slope. The respiratory quotient (RQ) was 0.92 until CO(2) concentration increased to about 15-17%, and after that it showed a strong increase, which is due to the initiation of anaerobic respiration. Anaerobic respiration has not been demonstrated for social insects before, but it is not surprising that it is found in this ant species, which lives in the extreme conditions of a hollow twig in an inundated mangrove.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
India 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 40 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Physiology
#453
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,780
of 91,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Physiology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.