| Title |
Rat Brain-Uptake Index for Phenylethylamine and Various Monomethylated Derivatives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurochemical Research, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11064-013-0988-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aron D. Mosnaim, Owen H. Callaghan, Thomas Hudzik, Marion E. Wolf |
| Abstract |
Phenylethylamine and its monomethylated derivatives p-methylphenylethylamine, α-methylphenylethylamine, phenylethylamine itself, N-methylphenylethylamine, o-methylphenylethylamine, and β-methylphenylethylamine, readily cross the blood-brain barrier showing a brain-uptake index (%) ± SD (water considered 100 %), of 108 ± 11, 98 ± 14, 83 ± 6, 78 ± 11, 62 ± 7 and 56 ± 6, respectively (injection of tritiated water and 100 μg standard amine, which was measured by gas-liquid chromatography). Similar brain-uptake index values (determined by double isotope counting) were obtained for phenylethylamine and α-methylphenylethylamine (amphetamine) after the injection of tritiated water and C(14)-labeled amine (either 3 μg or when added 100 μg standard compound), suggesting that they entered the brain via passive diffusion. Accordingly, both amines distributed rather evenly in the various rat brain areas examined: uptake index (%) ± SD (double isotope counting; non-, and diluted labeled amine) for phenylethylamine (89 ± 8 and 78 ± 7, 83 ± 9 and 86 ± 9, 96 ± 6 and 84 ± 7) and for α-methylphenylethylamine (88 ± 11 and 87 ± 9, 93 ± 14 and 87 ± 11, 97 ± 12 and 87 ± 9) for the cerebellum, frontal cortex, and striatum, respectively. These results will aid a greater understanding of the pharmacological and behavioral effects observed after the administration of phenylethylamine and methylphenylethylamine derivatives. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Neurochemical Research
#589
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,415
of 283,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurochemical Research
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.