↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Gender Difference on Cardiac Myocyte Dysfunction in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Effects of Gender Difference on Cardiac Myocyte Dysfunction in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats
Published in
Endocrine, January 2006
DOI 10.1385/endo:29:1:135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanfeng Ding, Ruijiao Zou, Robert L. Judd, Juming Zhong

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Computer Science 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine
#465
of 1,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,088
of 154,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.