Title |
Some folk uses ofPeganum harmala in India and Pakistan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Economic Botany, July 1967
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02860378 |
Authors |
Ikram Hassan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
#18,391,439
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#801
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,167
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.