↓ Skip to main content

Economic Evaluation of Lupus Nephritis in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Inception Cohort Using a Multistate Model Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Care & Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic Evaluation of Lupus Nephritis in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Inception Cohort Using a Multistate Model Approach
Published in
Arthritis Care & Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/acr.23480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan R. W. Barber, John G. Hanly, Li Su, Murray B. Urowitz, Yvan St. Pierre, Juanita Romero‐Diaz, Caroline Gordon, Sang‐Cheol Bae, Sasha Bernatsky, Daniel J. Wallace, David A. Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Ellen M. Ginzler, Michelle Petri, Ian N. Bruce, Paul R. Fortin, Dafna D. Gladman, Jorge Sanchez‐Guerrero, Rosalind Ramsey‐Goldman, Munther A. Khamashta, Cynthia Aranow, Meggan Mackay, Graciela S. Alarcón, Susan Manzi, Ola Nived, Andreas Jönsen, Asad A. Zoma, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven, Manuel Ramos‐Casals, Guillermo Ruiz‐Irastorza, S. Sam Lim, Kenneth C. Kalunian, Murat Inanc, Diane L. Kamen, Christine A. Peschken, Soren Jacobsen, Anca Askanase, Chris Theriault, Vernon Farewell, Ann E. Clarke

Abstract

Little is known about the long-term costs of lupus nephritis (LN). These were compared between patients with and without LN based on multistate modelling. Patients from 32 centres in 11 countries were enrolled in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort within 15 months of diagnosis and provided annual data on renal function, hospitalizations, medications, dialysis, and selected procedures. LN was diagnosed by renal biopsy or the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. Renal function was assessed annually using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or proteinuria (ePrU). A multistate model was used to predict 10-year cumulative costs by multiplying annual costs associated with each renal state by the expected state duration. 1,545 patients participated, 89.3% female, mean age at diagnosis 35.2 years (SD 13.4), 49.0% Caucasian, and mean follow up 6.3 years (SD 3.3). LN developed in 39.4% by the end of follow up. Ten-year cumulative costs were greater in those with LN and an eGFR < 30 ml/min ($310 579 2015 Canadian dollars versus $19 987 if no LN and eGFR > 60 ml/min) or with LN and ePrU > 3 g/d ($84 040 versus $20 499 if no LN and ePrU < 0.25 g/d). Patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min incurred 10-year costs 15-fold higher than those with normal eGFR. By estimating the expected duration in each renal state and incorporating associated annual costs, disease severity at presentation can be used to anticipate future healthcare costs. This is critical knowledge for cost-effectiveness evaluations of novel therapies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Unspecified 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 18 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Unspecified 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,539,643
of 24,579,850 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Care & Research
#879
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,100
of 337,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Care & Research
#23
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.