↓ Skip to main content

Causes of the eelgrass wasting disease: Van der Werff's changing theories

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Ecology, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Causes of the eelgrass wasting disease: Van der Werff's changing theories
Published in
Aquatic Ecology, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02334245
Authors

P. H. Nienhuis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Other 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Ecology
#102
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,468
of 21,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Ecology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.