↓ Skip to main content

Marijuana and ethanol: Differential effects on time perception, heart rate, and subjective response

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, January 1976
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Marijuana and ethanol: Differential effects on time perception, heart rate, and subjective response
Published in
Psychopharmacology, January 1976
DOI 10.1007/bf00426830
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jared R. Tinklenberg, Walton T. Roth, Bert S. Kopell

Abstract

Performance on a time production task, heart rate, and subjective responses were studied in twelve male sujects given oral doses of marijuana (0.7 mg of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol/kg), ethanol (1.0 ml/kg), and placebo, on three testing days which were each separated by 1 week. Orders were balanced across subjects and testing conditions were double-blind. Compared to ethanol and placebo, marijuana induced a significant under-production of time intervals, suggesting an acceleration of the internal rate of time perception. The onset of this acceleration of time sense in which geophysical time seemed to pass slowly corresponded with the characteristic increase in heart rate and the onset of the subjective feelings of drug effects. Initial phases of alcohol intoxication were associated with the opposite effects on the time production task. These findings replicate previous work and indicate that an easily administered time production task provides a consistent, non-motor measure of acute marijuana intoxication and also reflects ethanol intoxication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Japan 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 56 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,941,770
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,115
of 5,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,364
of 22,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#10
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.