| Title |
Go before the whistle blows: an empirical analysis of director turnover and financial fraud
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Accounting Studies, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11142-016-9381-z |
| Authors |
Yanmin Gao, Jeong-Bon Kim, Desmond Tsang, Haibin Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 51 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 70 | 43% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 28 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 50 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,223,055
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Review of Accounting Studies
#41
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,920
of 421,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Accounting Studies
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them