You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Science deficiency in conservation practice: the monitoring of tiger populations in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Conservation, February 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s1367943003003184 |
| Authors |
K. Ullas Karanth, James D. Nichols, John Seidenstricker, Eric Dinerstein, James L. David Smith, Charles McDougal, A. J. T. Johnsingh, Raghunandan S. Chundawat, Valmik Thapar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 10 | 2% |
| India | 9 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 1% |
| Nepal | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 531 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 134 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 104 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 95 | 16% |
| Unknown | 51 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 313 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 156 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 3% |
| Unknown | 64 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,918,515
of 24,833,004 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#295
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,565
of 83,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#10
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.