↓ Skip to main content

性染色体がXX型を呈した男子の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology, January 1969
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 205)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
性染色体がXX型を呈した男子の1例
Published in
Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology, January 1969
DOI 10.5980/jpnjurol1928.60.4_279
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshinori Mori, Shutaro Mizutani, Takao Sonoda, Junichi Furuyama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,719,376
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology
#19
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,022
of 13,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them