↓ Skip to main content

A comparative analysis of the Darwin-Wallace papers and the development of the concept of natural selection

Overview of attention for article published in Theory in Biosciences, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 195)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
A comparative analysis of the Darwin-Wallace papers and the development of the concept of natural selection
Published in
Theory in Biosciences, December 2003
DOI 10.1007/s12064-003-0063-6
Authors

U. Kutschera

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Cuba 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 86 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Other 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 40%
Environmental Science 8 8%
Philosophy 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,984,288
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Theory in Biosciences
#46
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,341
of 133,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory in Biosciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them