↓ Skip to main content

Biotechnological production of amino acids and derivatives: current status and prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
17 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
659 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
767 Mendeley
Title
Biotechnological production of amino acids and derivatives: current status and prospects
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, September 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00253-005-0155-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Leuchtenberger, Klaus Huthmacher, Karlheinz Drauz

Abstract

For almost 50 years now, biotechnological production processes have been used for industrial production of amino acids. Market development has been particularly dynamic for the flavor-enhancer glutamate and the animal feed amino acids L: -lysine, L: -threonine, and L: -tryptophan, which are produced by fermentation processes using high-performance strains of Corynebacterium glutamicum and Escherichia coli from sugar sources such as molasses, sucrose, or glucose. But the market for amino acids in synthesis is also becoming increasingly important, with annual growth rates of 5-7%. The use of enzymes and whole cell biocatalysts has proven particularly valuable in production of both proteinogenic and nonproteinogenic L: -amino acids, D: -amino acids, and enantiomerically pure amino acid derivatives, which are of great interest as building blocks for active ingredients that are applied as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and agricultural products. Nutrition and health will continue to be the driving forces for exploiting the potential of microorganisms, and possibly also of suitable plants, to arrive at even more efficient processes for amino acid production.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 767 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
India 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 745 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 153 20%
Student > Master 126 16%
Student > Bachelor 118 15%
Researcher 114 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 3%
Other 90 12%
Unknown 140 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 250 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 150 20%
Chemistry 85 11%
Engineering 43 6%
Chemical Engineering 32 4%
Other 40 5%
Unknown 167 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,171,975
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#162
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,406
of 60,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.