↓ Skip to main content

The tragedy of the commons that wasn't: On technical solutions to the institutions game

Overview of attention for article published in Population and Environment, March 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
The tragedy of the commons that wasn't: On technical solutions to the institutions game
Published in
Population and Environment, March 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf01357919
Authors

Carl J. Dahlman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 35%
Environmental Science 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Arts and Humanities 2 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,592,153
of 25,515,042 outputs
Outputs from Population and Environment
#195
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,924
of 16,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population and Environment
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,515,042 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.