↓ Skip to main content

Increases in Australian cutaneous abscess hospitalisations: 1999–2008

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Increases in Australian cutaneous abscess hospitalisations: 1999–2008
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10096-011-1281-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. L. Vaska, G. R. Nimmo, M. Jones, K. Grimwood, D. L. Paterson

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Such infections have increased in several countries recently and at a time when community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) strains have emerged globally. We examined changes in Australian hospitalisations for the treatment of cutaneous abscesses between 1999 and 2008, a period when increased numbers of CA-MRSA infections were being reported. National hospitalisation data for cutaneous abscess treatment (1999-2008) were examined. Hospitalisation numbers were collated and age-specific admission rates calculated and examined for changes over time. Yearly admissions for the treatment of cutaneous abscesses increased by 48%, from 8,849 (1999-2000) to 13,126 (2007-2008). The crude annual hospitalisation rate per 100,000 population rose from 46 to 62 respectively. However, increases in admission rates were limited to the 10 to 54 years age range. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for final versus baseline year admission rates for these age groups ranged from 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.78) for those aged 10-14 years to 1.64 (95% CI 1.26-2.12) for those aged 45-49 years; p<0.05. Increases in hospitalisation for cutaneous abscess treatment have occurred in Australia during the last decade. Research into the underlying causes and prevention of these infections is a public health priority.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#778
of 2,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,586
of 110,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.