| Title |
Development of a triage protocol for critical care during an influenza pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.060911 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael D Christian, Laura Hawryluck, Randy S Wax, Tim Cook, Neil M Lazar, Margaret S Herridge, Matthew P Muller, Douglas R Gowans, Wendy Fortier, Frederick M Burkle |
| Abstract |
The recent outbreaks of avian influenza (H5N1) have placed a renewed emphasis on preparing for an influenza pandemic in humans. Of particular concern in this planning is the allocation of resources, such as ventilators and antiviral medications, which will likely become scarce during a pandemic. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 47% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 27% |
| Unknown | 36 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#404,157
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#709
of 9,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#809
of 167,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.