↓ Skip to main content

Year based EM-index: a new approach to evaluate the scientific impact of scholars

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Year based EM-index: a new approach to evaluate the scientific impact of scholars
Published in
Scientometrics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11192-017-2625-2
Authors

Anand Bihari, Sudhakar Tripathi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 29%
Computer Science 5 24%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,487,739
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,986
of 2,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,239
of 442,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#49
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.