You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decision‐making for mitigating wildlife diseases: From theory to practice for an emerging fungal pathogen of amphibians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.13089 |
| Authors |
Stefano Canessa, Claudio Bozzuto, Evan H. Campbell Grant, Sam S. Cruickshank, Matthew C. Fisher, Jacob C. Koella, Stefan Lötters, An Martel, Frank Pasmans, Ben C. Scheele, Annemarieke Spitzen‐van der Sluijs, Sebastian Steinfartz, Benedikt R. Schmidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Zambia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 66% |
| Scientists | 32 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#570,016
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#336
of 4,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,711
of 454,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#13
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.