↓ Skip to main content

Heterogeneous traders and the Tobin tax

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evolutionary Economics, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Heterogeneous traders and the Tobin tax
Published in
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, February 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00191-003-0140-5
Authors

Frank Westerhoff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Belgium 1 4%
Unknown 24 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 30%
Student > Master 8 30%
Professor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 48%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 22%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2010.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#104
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,842
of 126,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them