↓ Skip to main content

Estimating water–food–ecosystem trade-offs for the global negative emission scenario (IPCC-RCP2.6)

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability Science, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Estimating water–food–ecosystem trade-offs for the global negative emission scenario (IPCC-RCP2.6)
Published in
Sustainability Science, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0522-5
Authors

Yoshiki Yamagata, Naota Hanasaki, Akihiko Ito, Tsuguki Kinoshita, Daisuke Murakami, Qian Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Master 16 14%
Other 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 31 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 12%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Energy 7 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 38 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,456,636
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#254
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,692
of 456,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.