↓ Skip to main content

Active adaptive conservation of threatened species in the face of uncertainty

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Active adaptive conservation of threatened species in the face of uncertainty
Published in
Ecological Applications, July 2010
DOI 10.1890/09-0647.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eve McDonald-Madden, William J. M. Probert, Cindy E. Hauser, Michael C. Runge, Hugh P. Possingham, Menna E. Jones, Joslin L. Moore, Tracy M. Rout, Peter A. Vesk, Brendan A. Wintle

Abstract

Adaptive management has a long history in the natural resource management literature, but despite this, few practitioners have developed adaptive strategies to conserve threatened species. Active adaptive management provides a framework for valuing learning by measuring the degree to which it improves long-run management outcomes. The challenge of an active adaptive approach is to find the correct balance between gaining knowledge to improve management in the future and achieving the best short-term outcome based on current knowledge. We develop and analyze a framework for active adaptive management of a threatened species. Our case study concerns a novel facial tumor disease affecting the Australian threatened species Sarcophilus harrisii: the Tasmanian devil. We use stochastic dynamic programming with Bayesian updating to identify the management strategy that maximizes the Tasmanian devil population growth rate, taking into account improvements to management through learning to better understand disease latency and the relative effectiveness of three competing management options. Exactly which management action we choose each year is driven by the credibility of competing hypotheses about disease latency and by the population growth rate predicted by each hypothesis under the competing management actions. We discover that the optimal combination of management actions depends on the number of sites available and the time remaining to implement management. Our approach to active adaptive management provides a framework to identify the optimal amount of effort to invest in learning to achieve long-run conservation objectives.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
Australia 5 2%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 205 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Student > Master 32 15%
Other 12 5%
Professor 10 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 38%
Environmental Science 71 32%
Engineering 6 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 32 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,254,039
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,819
of 3,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,920
of 98,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.