↓ Skip to main content

Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, March 1982
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
515 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, March 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf01805718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Russo, Lee K. Tay, Irma H. Russo

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that in humans certain factors such as early menarche, late pregnancy, and nulliparity are associated with a higher risk of developing breast cancer, while early pregnancy acts as a protective factor. Induction of mammary cancer in rats by administration of the chemical carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene reveals that the same factors influencing human breast cancer risk also affect the susceptibility of the rat mammary gland to the chemical carcinogen. Nulliparous rats and rats undergoing pregnancy interruption are more susceptible to developing carcinomas. This fact has been attributed to the incomplete differentiation of the gland at the time of carcinogen administration. Parous rats are resistant to the carcinogenic effect of DMBA, which is explained by the complete development of the gland attained during pregnancy and lactation. This development is manifested by the differentiation of terminal end buds into secretory units, which have a smaller proliferative compartment; the epithelial cells of these secretory units have a longer cell cycle, less avidity for binding DMBA, and possess a more efficient DNA excision repair capacity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,189,057
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#283
of 5,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172
of 7,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them