↓ Skip to main content

Helping hands: A study of altruistic behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Gender Issues, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Helping hands: A study of altruistic behavior
Published in
Gender Issues, September 2002
DOI 10.1007/s12147-002-0024-2
Authors

Elizabeth Monk-Turner, Victoria Blake, Fred Chniel, Sarah Forbes, Lisa Lensey, Jason Madzuma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 40%
Social Sciences 5 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Gender Issues
#60
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,340
of 45,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gender Issues
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.