↓ Skip to main content

On the consistency of act- and motive-utilitarianism: A reply to Robert Adams

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, May 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
On the consistency of act- and motive-utilitarianism: A reply to Robert Adams
Published in
Philosophical Studies, May 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00989590
Authors

Fred Feldman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 44%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 22%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#268
of 1,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,886
of 20,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.