↓ Skip to main content

丸山ワクチンは今

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Ika Daigaku Igakkai Zasshi, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
丸山ワクチンは今
Published in
Nihon Ika Daigaku Igakkai Zasshi, January 2017
DOI 10.1272/manms.13.4
Authors

江上 格

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,563,853
of 24,482,039 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Ika Daigaku Igakkai Zasshi
#8
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,770
of 429,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Ika Daigaku Igakkai Zasshi
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,482,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.