| Title |
PTFE-coated non-stick cookware and toxicity concerns: a perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11356-017-0095-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muhammad Sajid, Muhammad Ilyas |
| Abstract |
PTFE is used as an inner coating material in non-stick cookware. This unique polymer coating prevents food from sticking in the pans during the cooking process. Such cookware is also easy to wash. At normal cooking temperatures, PTFE-coated cookware releases various gases and chemicals that present mild to severe toxicity. Only few studies describe the toxicity of PTFE but without solid conclusions. The toxicity and fate of ingested PTFE coatings are also not understood. Moreover, the emerging, persistent, and well-known toxic environmental pollutant PFOA is also used in the synthesis of PTFA. There are some reports where PFOA was detected in the gas phase released from the cooking utensils under normal cooking temperatures. Due to toxicity concerns, PFOA has been replaced with other chemicals such as GenX, but these new alternatives are also suspected to have similar toxicity. Therefore, more extensive and systematic research efforts are required to respond the prevailing dogma about human exposure and toxic effects to PTFE, PFOA, and GenX and other alternatives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 14% |
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 48 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 97% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 248 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 22 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 89 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 30 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 22 | 9% |
| Engineering | 16 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 23% |
| Unknown | 97 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 267. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#137,935
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#9
of 11,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,961
of 324,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.