↓ Skip to main content

Innovative vaccine production technologies: The evolution and value of vaccine production technologies

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Pharmacal Research, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Innovative vaccine production technologies: The evolution and value of vaccine production technologies
Published in
Archives of Pharmacal Research, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12272-009-1400-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

KyungDong Bae, JunYoul Choi, YangSuk Jang, SangJeom Ahn, ByungKi Hur

Abstract

This review paper provides an overview of innovative technologies designed to produce bacterial, viral, recombinant subunit, and polysaccharide vaccines, as well as combination vaccines. Advances in this field are illustrated by vaccines against DTP (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis), influenza, hepatitis B (HepB) and typhoid fever. In addition, technological trends regarding antigens, adjuvants, and preservatives in vaccines are discussed. The progress achieved in vaccine production technologies is especially important for improving the protection of vulnerable populations against infectious diseases. These at-risk groups include infants, the elderly and immunocompromized individuals, as well as people living in developing countries or emerging economies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 96 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 22%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 9%
Engineering 8 8%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,906,861
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#172
of 1,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,475
of 94,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.