↓ Skip to main content

Carnivore-Caused Livestock Mortality in Trans-Himalaya

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
Title
Carnivore-Caused Livestock Mortality in Trans-Himalaya
Published in
Environmental Management, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00267-005-0178-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsewang Namgail, Joseph L. Fox, Yash Veer Bhatnagar

Abstract

The loss of livestock to wild predators is an important livelihood concern among Trans-Himalayan pastoralists. Because of the remoteness and inaccessibility of the region, few studies have been carried out to quantify livestock depredation by wild predators. In the present study, we assessed the intensity of livestock depredation by snow leopard Uncia uncia, Tibetan wolf Canis lupus chanku, and Eurasian lynx Lynx l. isabellina in three villages, namely Gya, Rumtse, and Sasoma, within the proposed Gya-Miru Wildlife Sanctuary in Ladakh, India. The three villages reported losses of 295 animals to these carnivores during a period of 2.5 years ending in early 2003, which represents an annual loss rate of 2.9% of their livestock holdings. The Tibetan wolf was the most important predator, accounting for 60% of the total livestock loss because of predation, followed by snow leopard (38%) and lynx (2%). Domestic goat was the major victim (32%), followed by sheep (30%), yak (15%), and horse (13%). Wolves killed horses significantly more and goats less than would be expected from their relative abundance. Snow leopards also killed horses significantly more than expected, whereas they killed other livestock types in proportion to their abundance. The three villages combined incurred an estimated annual monetary loss of approximately $USD 12,120 amounting to approximately $USD 190/household/y. This relatively high total annual loss occurred primarily because of depredation of the most valuable livestock types such as yak and horse. Conservation actions should initially attempt to target decrease of predation on these large and valuable livestock species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 11 3%
Brazil 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 323 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 21%
Student > Master 67 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 18%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Other 19 5%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 48 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 175 49%
Environmental Science 93 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 56 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#737
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,368
of 169,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.