↓ Skip to main content

Cytokines, Signal Transduction, and Inflammatory Demyelination: Review and Hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Neurochemical Research, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Cytokines, Signal Transduction, and Inflammatory Demyelination: Review and Hypothesis
Published in
Neurochemical Research, March 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1022493013904
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert W. Ledeen, Goutam Chakraborty

Abstract

The mechanism of focal demyelination in multiple sclerosis has been a long-standing enigma of this disorder. Cytokines, a diverse family of signalling molecules, are viewed as potential mediators of the process based on clinical observations and studies with animal models and tissue/cell culture systems. Myelin and oligodendrocyte (OL) destruction occur in cultured preparations subjected to cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) and lymphotoxin (LT). Many studies have shown these and other cytokines to be elevated at lesion sites and in the CSF of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, with similar findings in animal models. Some variability in the nature of MS lesion formation has been reported, both OLs and myelin being primary targets. To account for myelin destruction in the presence of apparently functional OLs we hypothesize that cytokines such as TNF alpha and LT alpha contribute to myelin damage through triggering of specific reactions within the myelin sheath. We further propose that neutral sphingomyelinase (SMase) is one such enzyme, two forms of which have been detected in purified myelin. An additional event is accumulation of cholesterol ester, apparently a downstream consequence of cytokine-induced SMase. The resulting lipid changes are viewed as potentially destabilizing to myelin, which may render it more vulnerable to attack by invading and resident phagocytes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Computer Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neurochemical Research
#633
of 2,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,887
of 31,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurochemical Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them