Title |
Selective EGF-Receptor Inhibition in CD4+ T Cells Induces Anergy and Limits Atherosclerosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.084 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lynda Zeboudj, Mikael Maître, Lea Guyonnet, Ludivine Laurans, Jeremie Joffre, Jeremie Lemarie, Simon Bourcier, Wared Nour-Eldine, Coralie Guérin, Jonas Friard, Abdelilah Wakkach, Elizabeth Fabre, Alain Tedgui, Ziad Mallat, Pierre-Louis Tharaux, Hafid Ait-Oufella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 13% |
Spain | 2 | 7% |
Colombia | 2 | 7% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Norway | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 60% |
Scientists | 5 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 16% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 16% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,239,273
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#4,665
of 16,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,228
of 451,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#104
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.