↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of an abbreviated screening MRI protocol for patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Abdominal Radiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of an abbreviated screening MRI protocol for patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
Abdominal Radiology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00261-017-1339-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Y. Lee, Eugene J. Huo, Stefanie Weinstein, Charmaine Santos, Alexander Monto, Carlos U. Corvera, Judy Yee, Thomas A. Hope

Abstract

In this study, we compare an abbreviated screening MRI protocol (aMRI), utilizing only dynamic contrast-enhanced images, to a conventional liver MRI (cMRI) for the characterization of observations in at-risk patients. 164 consecutive HCC screening MRIs were retrospectively analyzed. Two sets of de-identified image sets were created: one with all acquired sequences including T2- and diffusion-weighted sequences (cMRI), and one with only T1-weighted precontrast and dynamic post-contrast images utilizing an extracellular gadolinium contrast agent (aMRI). Three readers assigned a LI-RADS score based on the lesion with the highest LI-RADS category using the aMRI and cMRI datasets during separate reads. There was no change between the aMRI and cMRI LI-RADS categorization in 93%, 96%, and 96% of cases for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In the majority of the discrepant cases, the score increased from LI-RADS 3 to LI-RADS 4 due to the presence of ancillary features on T2 and DWI. Kappa values for interobserver variability demonstrated fair-to-moderate LI-RADS agreement among the 3 readers. There was strong agreement between the abbreviated T1-only MRI protocol and a full liver MRI, with only 5% of cases changing LI-RADS categorization due to the inclusion of T2 and DWI. The estimated time to run this abbreviated MRI is approximately 7-10 min, possibly allowing for a more cost-effective screening MRI than our cMRIs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 15 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 33%
Unspecified 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 48%