| Title |
Symmetric binary B-Trees: Data structure and maintenance algorithms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Informatica, December 1972
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00289509 |
| Authors |
Rudolf Bayer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 47 | 64% |
| Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Informatica
#15
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#813
of 17,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Informatica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.