You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wolf–Bison Interactions in Yellowstone National Park
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Mammalogy, November 2000
|
DOI | 10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<1128:wbiiyn>2.0.co;2 |
Authors |
Douglas W. Smith, L. David Mech, Mary Meagher, Wendy E. Clark, Rosemary Jaffe, Michael K. Phillips, John A. Mack |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 4 | 2% |
India | 3 | 1% |
United States | 3 | 1% |
Czechia | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 231 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 59 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 17% |
Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
Other | 15 | 6% |
Other | 31 | 12% |
Unknown | 39 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 139 | 55% |
Environmental Science | 47 | 19% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 3% |
Unknown | 48 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,211,844
of 25,353,525 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalogy
#763
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,522
of 40,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalogy
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,353,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them