↓ Skip to main content

Major wet interval in white mountains medieval warm period evidenced inδ13C of bristlecone pine tree rings

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Major wet interval in white mountains medieval warm period evidenced inδ13C of bristlecone pine tree rings
Published in
Climatic Change, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01092420
Authors

Steven W. Leavitt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Spain 1 4%
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 23 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 15%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,780,671
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#2,609
of 5,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,269
of 22,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.