↓ Skip to main content

Amor and Social Stigma: ASD Beliefs Among Immigrant Mexican Parents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Amor and Social Stigma: ASD Beliefs Among Immigrant Mexican Parents
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3457-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shana R. Cohen, Jessica Miguel

Abstract

This study examined cultural beliefs about ASD and its causes among Mexican-heritage families. In focus group interviews, we asked 25 immigrant parents of children with ASD to identify words they associated with ASD and its causes. Participants free-listed, ranked, and justified their responses. Mixed methods analyses utilized saliency scores to calculate responses. Deductive interview analyses justified participants' responses. Salient responses for ASD perceptions included specific characteristics about the child (e.g., loving) and perceptions about lack of resources. Salient responses for ASD causes were vaccines, genetics, and a combination of genetics and environment. Inductive analyses revealed distinct beliefs about social stigma, child characteristics, factors supporting development, and parents' emotional stress. Interpretations linked these beliefs to promising adaptations in diagnosis and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Researcher 7 4%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 58 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 28%
Social Sciences 19 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 63 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,940,461
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,390
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,340
of 449,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#73
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.