↓ Skip to main content

Management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Colorectal Disease, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00384-017-2950-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando A. Angarita, Adina E. Feinberg, Stanley M. Feinberg, Robert H. Riddell, J. Andrea McCart

Abstract

Benign polyps that are technically challenging and unsafe to remove via polypectomy are known as complex polyps. Concerns regarding safety and completeness of resection dictate they undergo advanced endoscopic techniques, such as endoscopic mucosal resection or surgery. We provide a comprehensive overview of complex polyps and current treatment options. A review of the English literature was conducted to identifyarticles describing the management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum. Endoscopic mucosal resection is the standard of care for the majority of complex polyps. Only polyps that fail endoscopic mucosal resection or are highly suspicious of invasive cancer but which cannot be removed endoscopically warrant surgery. Several factors influence the treatment of a complex polyp; therefore, there cannot be a "one-size-fitsall" approach. Treatment should be tailored to the lesion's characteristics, the risk of adverse events, and the resources available to the treating physician.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,892,100
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#80
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,374
of 441,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.