↓ Skip to main content

Atypical Antipsychotics in Children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Drugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Atypical Antipsychotics in Children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders
Published in
Pediatric Drugs, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00148581-200709040-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Chavez, Mapy Chavez-Brown, Michael A. Sopko, Jose A. Rey

Abstract

The treatment of pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) is a challenging task, which should include behavioral therapy modifications as well as pharmacologic therapy. There has been a lack of data on using medications in children with PDDs until recent years. Within the last 10 years, an increase in clinical research has attempted to provide efficacy and safety data to support the use of medications in children with PDDs. Double-blinded and open-label research of atypical antipsychotics has been of particular focus. Evidence shows that atypical antipsychotics (AAs) may be useful in treating certain symptoms associated with PDDs, such as aggression, irritability, and self-injurious behavior. This article reviews the literature regarding the use of AAs in children with PDDs. Of the AAs, risperidone has the largest amount of evidence with five published double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials and nine open-label trials. These risperidone trials have consistently shown improvements in aggression, irritability, self-injurious behavior, temper tantrums, and quickly changing moods associated with autistic disorder and other PDDs. Data for the other AAs are limited, but ziprasidone and aripiprazole appear to be promising treatment options. Based on clinical trials, olanzapine and quetiapine have shown minimal clinical benefit and a high incidence of weight gain and sedation. It should be noted that all AAs do have a risk of metabolic syndrome, and patients should be monitored appropriately while receiving these medications. Overall, AAs can be beneficial in alleviating behavioral symptoms, and should be considered an appropriate therapeutic option, as part of a comprehensive treatment strategy, for children with PDD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 27%
Psychology 28 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Drugs
#122
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,454
of 186,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Drugs
#38
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.