| Title |
Prospective associations between recalled parental bonding and perinatal depression: a cohort study in urban and rural Turkey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00127-018-1484-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Berker Duman, Vesile Senturk Cankorur, Clare Taylor, Robert Stewart |
| Abstract |
Recalled experiences of parental bonding may be important in the aetiology of perinatal depression. We hypothesized that lower recalled parental bonding would be associated with perinatal depression. In a cohort study of perinatal depression in Turkey, 677 women were recruited in their third trimester. Parental Bonding Inventory (PBI) scores at baseline were investigated as predictors of depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at 4, 14 and 21 months after childbirth in mothers without depression at baseline. Poor parental bonding scores, apart from paternal control and overprotection, were independently associated with antenatal depression. Incident postnatal depression at 4 months was predicted by parental overprotection, at 14 months by parental care and overprotection, and at 21 months by paternal control and overprotection. Less satisfactory parenting recalled in the antenatal period was an independent predictor of postnatal depression; however, the different bonding subscales varied as predictors according to the timing of the depression assessment after childbirth. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,940,289
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#731
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,671
of 447,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.