↓ Skip to main content

Preliminary results of a German field trial with different hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) accessions

Overview of attention for article published in Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, August 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Preliminary results of a German field trial with different hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) accessions
Published in
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, August 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1008696018533
Authors

Erika Schumann, Andreas Peil, Wilhelm Eberhard Weber

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Thailand 1 3%
Costa Rica 1 3%
Unknown 27 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 50%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#300
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,275
of 34,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them