↓ Skip to main content

Current status and future scenarios of hemp breeding

Overview of attention for article published in Euphytica, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Current status and future scenarios of hemp breeding
Published in
Euphytica, January 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10681-004-4760-0
Authors

Paolo Ranalli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 142 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Other 5 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 49%
Environmental Science 9 6%
Materials Science 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 38 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#324
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,433
of 133,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.