↓ Skip to main content

Perspective on immune oncology with liquid biopsy, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and microbiome with non-invasive biomarkers in cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Oncology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Perspective on immune oncology with liquid biopsy, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and microbiome with non-invasive biomarkers in cancer patients
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12094-017-1827-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Mitsuhashi, Y. Okuma

Abstract

Antibodies against immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) play a key role in the treatment of advanced lung cancer. To examine the clinical benefits of these agents, preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted to identify definitive biomarkers associated with cancer status. Analysis of the blood and feces of tumor patients has attracted attention in recent studies attempting to identify non-invasive biomarkers such as cytokines, soluble PD-L1, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and gut microbiota. These factors are believed to interact with each other to produce synergistic effects and contribute to the formation of the tumor immune microenvironment through the seven steps of the cancer immunity cycle. The immunogram was first introduced as a novel indicator to define the immunity status of cancer patients. In this review, we discuss the progress in the identification of predictive biomarkers as well as future prospects for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 28 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,774,737
of 25,391,471 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#209
of 1,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,734
of 456,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.