| Title |
Implications of LSD and experimental mysticism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Religion and Health, July 1966
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01532646 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter N. Pahnke, William A. Richards |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,383,438
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#225
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them