↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics and Oral Bioavailability of Scopolamine in Normal Subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, June 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics and Oral Bioavailability of Scopolamine in Normal Subjects
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, June 1989
DOI 10.1023/a:1015916423156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lakshmi Putcha, Nitza M. Cintrón, James Tsui, James M. Vanderploeg, William G. Kramer

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of scopolamine were evaluated in six healthy male subjects receiving 0.4 mg of the drug by either oral or intravenous administration. Plasma and urine samples were analyzed using a radioreceptor binding assay. After iv administration, scopolamine concentrations in the plasma declined in a biexponential fashion, with a rapid distribution phase and a comparatively slow elimination phase. Mean and SE values for volume of distribution, systemic clearance, and renal clearance were 1.4 +/- 0.3 liters/kg, 65.3 +/- 5.2 liters/hr, and 4.2 +/- 1.4 liters/hr, respectively. Mean peak plasma concentrations were 2909.8 +/- 240.9 pg/ml following iv administration and 528.6 +/- 109.4 pg/ml following oral administration. Elimination half-life of the drug was 4.5 +/- 1.7 hr. Bioavailability of the oral dose was variable among subjects, ranging between 10.7 and 48.2%. The variability in absorption and poor bioavailability of oral scopolamine indicate that this route of administration may not be reliable and effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 21%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 18%
Neuroscience 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,008
of 2,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,843
of 14,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.