↓ Skip to main content

On incorporating fire into our thinking about natural ecosystems:a response to Saha and Howe.

Overview of attention for article published in The American Naturalist, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On incorporating fire into our thinking about natural ecosystems:a response to Saha and Howe.
Published in
The American Naturalist, December 2001
DOI 10.1086/323594
Pubmed ID
Authors

J E Keeley, W J Bond

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
South Africa 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 88 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 11 11%
Professor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 46%
Environmental Science 26 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,680,234
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from The American Naturalist
#1,925
of 3,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,473
of 125,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Naturalist
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.